‘No magic answer’ when it comes to value-for-signal, lawyer says
Media | 07/26/2011 8:57 pm EDT
The CRTC’s apparent reticence to allow broadcasters to pull their signals during carriage negotiations under its proposed value-for-signal regime is a sure sign the debate over the controversial policy is far from over, experts say.
“The commission has long been of the view that they don’t want consumers to lose access to a signal,” David Elder, who practices communications, competition and privacy law as counsel with Stikeman Elliott LLP, said in an interview.
“The difficulty is that’s really the ultimate bargaining chip that both sides have.”
In March 2010, the CRTC issued a decision that would allow broadcasters to ask distributors for
...